Abstract
This article works with the hypothesis that institutional conditions have an important role to play in shaping the performance of R&D expenditures in laggard innovation systems. We have assessed 51 developing countries over the period 1980-2008. Dependent constructs consist in (i) labor productivity; and (ii) patenting activity. Three different measures of institutional quality were used: control of corruption, democratic predominance, and political rights. Results support the proposition that institutional quality matters for the efficiency of innovation inputs. The main implication concerns the need for improved institutional frameworks within developing countries in order to generate appropriate outcomes from R&D investments.
References
Acemoglu, D., and Johnson S. (2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 949-995. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/432166
Acemoglu, D., and Robinson. J. (2012). Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity and poverty. New York: Crown.
Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
Alonso, J., and Garcimartín. C. (2011). Criterios y factores de calidad institucional: un estudio empírico. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 19(55), 5-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.09.005
Asheim, B. and Isaksen. A. (1997). Location, agglomeration and innovation: towards regional innovation systems in Norway? European Planning Studies, 5(3), 299-330. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654319708720402
Barasa, L., Kimuyu, P., Vermeulen, P., Knoben, J., and Kinyanjui, B. (2017). Institutions, resources and innovation in East Africa: A firm level approach. Research Policy, 46(1),280-291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.11.008
Beck, N., & Katz, J. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634-647. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2082979
Castellacci, F., and Natera. J. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: a panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579-594. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.006
DiRienzo, C., and Das, J. (2014). Innovation and role of corruption and diversity: A cross-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 15(1), 51-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595814554790
Edquist, C. (ed). (1997). Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter.
Edquist, C. (2014). Striving towards a holistic innovation policy in European countries - but linearity still prevails! STI Policy Review, 5(2), 1-19.
Edquist, C., and Zabala-Iturriagagoitia. J. (2015). The Innovation Union Scoreboard is flawed: the case of Sweden - not being the innovation leader of the EU. [Papers in Innovation Studies n. 2015-16]. CIRCLE Lund University.
Fischer, B. (2015). On the contributions of knowledge-intensive business services’ multinationals to laggard innovation systems. Brazilian Administration Review, 12(2), 150-168. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-7692bar2015140070
Freeman, C. (1995). The National System of Innovation in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5-24.
Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
Furman, J., Porter, M., and Stern. S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4
Glaeser, E., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer. A. (2004). Do institutions cause growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 9(3), 271-303. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000038933.16398.ed
Goedhuys, M., Mohnen, P., and Taha, T. (2016). Corruption, innovation and firm growth: firm-level evidence from Egypt and Tunisia. Eurasian Business Review, 6(3), 299-322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-016-0062-4
Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92-116.
Griliches, Z. (1998). R&D and Productivity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Grogan, L., and Moers, L. (2001). Growth empirics with institutional measures for transition countries. Economic Systems, 25(4), 323-344. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0939-3625(01)00030-9
Guan, J., and Chen. K. (2012). Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Research Policy, 41(1), 102-115. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.001
Hall, R., and Jones. C. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83-116. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355399555954
Johnson, B. (1992). Institutional learning. In: Lundvall, B. (ed). National Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter.
Kotsemir, M. (2013). Measuring national innovation systems efficiency – a review of DEA approach. [Working Paper n. BRP 16/STI/2013]. National Research University – Higher School of Economics.
Krammer, S. (2015). Do good institutions enhance the effect of technological spillovers on
productivity? Comparative evidence from developed and transition economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 133-154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.09.002
Matthews, R. (1986). The economics of institutions and the sources of growth. The Economic Journal, 96(384), 903-918.
Nasierowski, W., and Arcelus. F. (2003). On the efficiency of national innovation systems. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 37(3), 215-234. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00046-0
Nelson. R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: a comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press
Nelson, R., and Sampat. B. (2001). Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44(1), 31-54. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00152-9
Niosi, J. (2002). National systems of innovations are “x-efficient” (and x-effective). Research Policy, 31(2), 291-302. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00142-1
North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Paunov, C. (2016). Corruption’s asymmetric impacts on firm innovation. Journal of Development Economics, 118, 216-231. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.006
Pinto, H., and Pereira. T. (2013). Efficiency of innovation systems in Europe: an institutional approach to the diversity of national profiles. European Planning Studies, 21(6), 755-779. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.665033
Rodríguez-Pose, A., and Di-Cataldo. M. (2014). Quality of government and innovative performance in the regions of Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 15(4), 673-706.
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbu023
Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high-quality growth: what they are and how to acquire them. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 3-31. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02699764
Sala-i-Martin, X. (2002). 15 years of new growth economics: what have we learnt? [Economics and Business Working Paper n. 620]. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Seitz, M., and Watzinger, M. (2017). Contract enforcement and R&D investment. Research Policy, 46(1), 182-195. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.015
Sharif, N. (2006). Emergence and development of the national innovation systems concept. Research Policy, 35(5), 745-766. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001
Tebaldi, E., and Elmslie, B. (2008). Institutions, innovation and economic growth. Journal of Economic Development, 33(2), 27-53.
Tebaldi, E., and Elmslie. B. (2013). Does Institutional Quality Impact Innovation? Evidence from Cross-Country Patent Grant Data. Applied Economics, 45(7), 887-900. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.613777
Whitley, R. (2007). Business systems and organizational capabilities – the institutional structuring of competitive competencies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wooldridge, J. (2000). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: The MIT Press.