Resumo
O objetivo deste documento é utilizar o método de análise de redes sociais (SNA) para estabelecer as diferenças entre o processo de transferência de tecnologia entre os Sistemas Regionais de Inovação (SRI) das regiões desenvolvidas e das regiões em desenvolvimento, a fim de derivar implicações políticas para as regiões com menor capacidade de inovação. Assim, os objetivos deste artigo são: caracterizar os sistemas de inovação das regiões desenvolvidas e em desenvolvimento. Em segundo lugar, propor uma bateria de instrumentos de política que estimulem redes e efeitos indiretos para regiões em desenvolvimento para fortalecer seus sistemas de inovaçãoReferências
Albornoz, M. & López Cerezo, J. A. (Eds.) (2015). Ciencia, tecnología y universidad en Iberoamérica. Argentina: Eudeba.
Balland, P. A., Boschma, R. & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907-920.
Boschma, R., Frenken, K., Bathelt, H., Feldman, M. & Kogler, D. (2012). Technological relatedness and regional branching. En: Beyond territory: Dynamic geographies of knowledge creation, diffusion and innovation (pp. 64-81). London: Routledge.
Bozeman, B. & Boardman, C. (2014). Assessing research collaboration studies: A framework for analysis. En: Research Collaboration and Team Science (pp. 1-11). Cham [Switzerland]: Springer.
Bradley, S. R., Hayter, C. S. & Link, A. (2013). Models and methods of university technology transfer. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 9(6), 571-650.
Caicedo, H. (2012). Análisis del sistema regional de ciencia, tecnología e innovación del Valle del Cauca. Estudios Gerenciales, 28 (ed. especial), 125-148.
Casas, R., Corona, J. M., Jaso, M., Vera-Cruz, A., Caballero Hernández, R. & Rivera, R. (2013). Construyendo el diálogo entre los actores del sistema de ciencia, tecnología e innovación libro conmemorativo a 10 años de la creación del Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico. México, D. F.: Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico. Signatura 351.855 F6.
Cantner, U, Meder, A. & Wal, A. (2008). Innovator networks and regional knowledge base. Jena Economic Research Papers, 42.
Chaminade, C. & Plechero, M. (2012). Do regions make a difference? Exploring the role of different regional innovation systems in global innovation networks in the ICT industry (Paper no. 2012/02). Lund, Sweden: Lund University, CIRCLE.
Dau, L. A. (2018). Contextualizing international learning: The moderating effects of mode of entry & subsidiary networks on the relationship between reforms & profitability. Journal of World Business, 53(3), 403-414. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.10.005
Del Giudice, M., Carayannis, E. G. & Maggioni, V. (2017). Global knowledge intensive enterprises and international technology transfer: emerging perspectives from a quadruple helix environment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 229-235.
Driffield, N. & Love, J. (2005). Who gains from whom? Competition and technology sourcing in the foreign-owned sector of UK manufacturing. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52(5), 663-686.
Dunning, J. H., (1993). Challenges for theorizing about MNEs and MEN activity. En: The globalization of business (pp. 37-167). London: Routledge.
Dunning, J. H. (2013). Multinationals, Technology & Competitiveness. London: Routledge. Serie RLE, International Business, vol. 13.
Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J. & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78-104
Gertler, M. & Levitte, Y. (2003). Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Conference DRUID Summer, Elsinore, Dinamarca.
Hanneman, R. (2000). Introducción a los métodos del análisis de redes sociales. Rescuperado de: http://revista-redes.rediris.es/webredes/textos/cap8.pdf
Hurtado-Torres, N. E., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2018). How does R&D internationalization in multinational firms affect their innovative performance? the moderating role of international collaboration in the energy industry. International Business Review, 27(3), 514-527.
Herrschel, T. & Tallberg, P. (2011). The role of the regions: Networks, scale, territory. Kristianstad: SWE: Region Skåne.
Llisterri, J. J., Pietrobelli, C. & Larsson, M. (eds.) (2011). Los sistemas regionales de innovación en América Latina. Washington, D.C.: BID.
Narula, R. (2010). Much ado about nothing, or sirens of a brave new world? MNE activity from developing countries and its significance for development. Paris: OCDE. 55 p.
Narula, R. & Michel, J. (2009). Reverse knowledge transfer and its implications for European policy. Maastricht, NLD: Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology. UNU-MERIT.
OCDE (2012). Promoviendo el crecimiento en todas las regiones [Promoting Growth in All Regions]. OECD Publishing. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264174634-en
Pitelis, C. N., & Teece, D. J. (2018). The new MNE: ‘Orchestration’ theory as envelope of ‘Internalisation’ theory. Management International Review, , 1-17. doi:10.1007/s11575-018-0346-2
Pietrobelli, C. & Rabellotti, R. (2011). Global value chains meet innovation systems: are there learning opportunities for developing countries? World Development, 39(7), 1261-1269.
Poetzsch, C. (2017). Technology transfer on a two-way street: R&D spillovers through intermediate input usage and supply. Review of World Economics, 153(4), 735-751.
Ramírez, J. C., Silva, I. & Cuervo, L. M. (2009). Economía y territorio en América Latina y el Caribe: desigualdades y políticas (vol. 99). Chile: CEPAL, United Nations.
Schmidt, T. & Sofka, W. (2009). Liability of foreignness as a barrier to knowledge spillovers: Lost in translation? Journal of International Management, 15(4), 460-474.
Suanes, M., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2015). Inversión extranjera directa, crecimiento económico y desigualdad en América Latina. El Trimestre Económico, 82(3), 675.